Number of Players Allowed
So you can have only 20 players in uniform for any given game: a goalie plus a spare who very rarely takes the ice, plus exactly three D pairs and four F lines. No room for error there. If a coach wants to go with a spare Dman he has to LOSE a forward, leaving him with an unbalanced squad...not even enough for four lines and forcing the rest of them to be potentially overworked. Question is, if you can have a spare goalie, then why not up the allotment to 22, to permit a spare Dman and a spare F? Then if someone gets injured, or a PP/PK specialist is desired or fresh legs are needed, the quality of the hockey doesn't have to suffer, which is better for coaches, players and fans alike. We're talking about two extra people, just a 10% increase. Many other sports liberally allow extra player availability; aside from the nominal additional travel expenses, is there any reason this would not be a desirable improvement in hockey? Anyone know why the rule is so restrictive with regard to team size?
For Democrats every day is opposite day. Getting destroyed in an election means the other side better wise up...record cold is evidence of too much heat...those who use guns to break the law will suddenly obey a law banning guns. And more law enforcement makes a community less safe.