BoltProspects Community Forums  

Go Back   BoltProspects Community Forums > Hockey Talk > The Farm

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-11-2019, 04:53 PM
dannybolt's Avatar
dannybolt dannybolt is offline
Bingo Bob's Intermission Contest
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: St. Pete
Posts: 1,758
Default Prospect Development Stalling?

Question to those who pay closer attention to Syracuse than I do:
Looking at the stats, it looks like only ABB and Foote (and Volkov, natch) are really developing into NHL caliber players.

It seems odd that nearly all of the highest performing players (Mueller, Conacher, Smith and Gaunce) are vet signees. Wouldn't you expect Katchouk, Raddysh or Stephens to be up there near the top in production? All three are at 4 points in the first 12/13 games.

I understand that we are still in the early stages of the season, but none of these guys are rookies still trying to find their feet. If anything, I'd expect them to be taking a step forward, but so far it doesn't seem like that's happening.

Am I reading too much into this?
__________________
Ondrej Palat fan club member
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-11-2019, 06:31 PM
Kizman Kizman is offline
Jimmie Olvestad's Dimensional Speed
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 186
Default

I have felt that way in regards to Stephen for awhile. Not sure what the problem is, but it's concerning.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-11-2019, 07:25 PM
Derek28 Derek28 is offline
Cooper's Law
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,070
Default

One reason is that Groulx seems to really rely on his veteran players. Other than Barre-Boulet, a lot of those other prospects don't get top 6 ice time or top PP unit time. Interestingly, Katchouk subbed in on the top line with Conacher and Mueller today for Smith who is banged up. He ended up scoring two goals and should of had a third that was waived off by a quick whistle.

Katchouk and Stephens are excellent penalty killers who I still think can play in a bottom six role at some point. I could see Raddysh being trade bait at some point this season.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-11-2019, 07:58 PM
dannybolt's Avatar
dannybolt dannybolt is offline
Bingo Bob's Intermission Contest
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: St. Pete
Posts: 1,758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek28 View Post
One reason is that Groulx seems to really rely on his veteran players. Other than Barre-Boulet, a lot of those other prospects don't get top 6 ice time or top PP unit time.
Isnt part of his job to get the prospects ready? Wasn't that why Cooper got the nickname the Rookie Whisperer (at least on BP)? I get that you want the prospects to earn it, but to me it doesn't make a ton of sense to load a team up with vets at the expense of prospects with upside. But far smarter men than me are making the decisions, I'm just curious about the whole not seeing a lot of points out of guys I expected it from.
__________________
Ondrej Palat fan club member
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2019, 08:07 PM
pete's Avatar
pete pete is offline
BP Staff
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,249
Default

I think, more to the point, the prospect pool in Syracuse just isn't as good as it's been in previous years.
__________________
S-S-S-S-S-S-Stammermeter 2019-2020: 07
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-15-2019, 05:31 AM
Kizman Kizman is offline
Jimmie Olvestad's Dimensional Speed
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pete View Post
I think, more to the point, the prospect pool in Syracuse just isn't as good as it's been in previous years.
Obvious, but true, but the Bolts aren't picking until late in round one every year for some time. Call Foote at 14 is our earliest pick in some time. I still feel like they have some good talent there, but no sure fire, can't miss players beyond Foote.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-15-2019, 08:14 AM
dannybolt's Avatar
dannybolt dannybolt is offline
Bingo Bob's Intermission Contest
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: St. Pete
Posts: 1,758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pete View Post
I think, more to the point, the prospect pool in Syracuse just isn't as good as it's been in previous years.
I remember there's been quite a few years where we were looking to draft role players rather than top 4/6 guys; taking low ceiling/high floor low risk picks. But those guys aren't pushing for tweener/bottom line roles either. That's the impetus for the question. I just expected Stephens/Katchouk/Raddysh to be closer I think, if their floors were so high, and they aren't pushing vets out of the way in the AHL either, if what I can glean from the stats is true. Caveat of course is that I'm not watching the games.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizman View Post
Obvious, but true, but the Bolts aren't picking until late in round one every year for some time. Call Foote at 14 is our earliest pick in some time. I still feel like they have some good talent there, but no sure fire, can't miss players beyond Foote.
I'd be more apt to believe that draft position was the case if we hadn't pulled like half the team out of later rounds.

I'm not expecting a Kucherov and Point out of every round, but there's a handful of guys that were expected to push for spots on the 3/4 line, that just aren't, which is why I'm curious about it.
__________________
Ondrej Palat fan club member
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-16-2019, 06:58 AM
Kizman Kizman is offline
Jimmie Olvestad's Dimensional Speed
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 186
Default

Point and Kuch, and for that matter TJ and Palat will definitely make the draft position argument look less defendable, but not getting access to top 5 or top 10 players has to, over time, decrease the amount of NHL ready player in your organization.

Al Murray and the others in our draft room certainly make up for the draft position weaknesses better then any crew that comes to mind, but that being said, it's a factor. It does seem as tho they actually do better on later round picks then the earlier ones. I also wonder how much weight Yzerman had on drafts, especially earlier round picks...just a thought.

I do agree with the initial point of this thread...that being that the development of players seems to be less then optimal. It certainly seems to be an area to raise a few eyebrows.

Last thought...they have traded a few players away that are in NHL currently, but I cannot fault any of the moves and I dont see any moves that are easily criticizable.

Last edited by Kizman; 11-16-2019 at 07:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-04-2019, 09:50 PM
Derek28 Derek28 is offline
Cooper's Law
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,070
Default

I've seen a couple Crunch games lately and the current Crunch team may be the worst coached AHL team that we have had in the Yzerman/BriseBois era. Awful effort level, and none of our prospects other than Stephens and ABB (mostly on the PP) look good or look like they are taking steps forward.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-05-2019, 07:07 PM
Kizman Kizman is offline
Jimmie Olvestad's Dimensional Speed
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek28 View Post
I've seen a couple Crunch games lately and the current Crunch team may be the worst coached AHL team that we have had in the Yzerman/BriseBois era. Awful effort level, and none of our prospects other than Stephens and ABB (mostly on the PP) look good or look like they are taking steps forward.

So...what's changed? Same coaching staff, right? If they are having so many issues, how come no firing of Grouxl?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005-2008, BoltProspects.com. All Rights Reserved.