BoltProspects Community Forums  

Go Back   BoltProspects Community Forums > Hockey Talk > Channelside

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-09-2013, 10:17 AM
Top Shelf's Avatar
Top Shelf Top Shelf is offline
Evan Oberg's Frequent Flyer Miles
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,326
Default Number of Players Allowed

So you can have only 20 players in uniform for any given game: a goalie plus a spare who very rarely takes the ice, plus exactly three D pairs and four F lines. No room for error there. If a coach wants to go with a spare Dman he has to LOSE a forward, leaving him with an unbalanced squad...not even enough for four lines and forcing the rest of them to be potentially overworked. Question is, if you can have a spare goalie, then why not up the allotment to 22, to permit a spare Dman and a spare F? Then if someone gets injured, or a PP/PK specialist is desired or fresh legs are needed, the quality of the hockey doesn't have to suffer, which is better for coaches, players and fans alike. We're talking about two extra people, just a 10% increase. Many other sports liberally allow extra player availability; aside from the nominal additional travel expenses, is there any reason this would not be a desirable improvement in hockey? Anyone know why the rule is so restrictive with regard to team size?

thx
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-09-2013, 10:22 AM
timothy's Avatar
timothy timothy is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Nashville
Posts: 7,408
Send a message via Yahoo to timothy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Top Shelf View Post
So you can have only 20 players in uniform for any given game: a goalie plus a spare who very rarely takes the ice, plus exactly three D pairs and four F lines. No room for error there. If a coach wants to go with a spare Dman he has to LOSE a forward, leaving him with an unbalanced squad...not even enough for four lines and forcing the rest of them to be potentially overworked. Question is, if you can have a spare goalie, then why not up the allotment to 22, to permit a spare Dman and a spare F? Then if someone gets injured, or a PP/PK specialist is desired or fresh legs are needed, the quality of the hockey doesn't have to suffer, which is better for coaches, players and fans alike. We're talking about two extra people, just a 10% increase. Many other sports liberally allow extra player availability; aside from the nominal additional travel expenses, is there any reason this would not be a desirable improvement in hockey? Anyone know why the rule is so restrictive with regard to team size?

thx
Isn't this where the better coaching rises to the top? Making scratch decisions and then managing the play with a potentially unbalanced squad? The challenge sparks innovation and resourcefulness. I guess it depends on how much you want it to be all about the players, or do you want the game within the game to emerge.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005-2008, BoltProspects.com. All Rights Reserved.