Number of Players Allowed
So you can have only 20 players in uniform for any given game: a goalie plus a spare who very rarely takes the ice, plus exactly three D pairs and four F lines. No room for error there. If a coach wants to go with a spare Dman he has to LOSE a forward, leaving him with an unbalanced squad...not even enough for four lines and forcing the rest of them to be potentially overworked. Question is, if you can have a spare goalie, then why not up the allotment to 22, to permit a spare Dman and a spare F? Then if someone gets injured, or a PP/PK specialist is desired or fresh legs are needed, the quality of the hockey doesn't have to suffer, which is better for coaches, players and fans alike. We're talking about two extra people, just a 10% increase. Many other sports liberally allow extra player availability; aside from the nominal additional travel expenses, is there any reason this would not be a desirable improvement in hockey? Anyone know why the rule is so restrictive with regard to team size?
Silver lining of Grubergate scandal: It reveals graphically the hateful contempt harbored by the central authoritarian controllers for even their own supporters. Democrats can disprove Gruber's repeated assertions about their being stupid, but only if they repudiate the "ACA" sham and the criminal fraud that was committed against Democrat voters in order to dupe them into supporting it, and finally join responsible Republicans in killing and burying the thing.